[Summit] Summit Digest, Vol 65, Issue 59

[Peter Gallant]

Glad to hear it. Regardless of how well meaning the organizers are, eight 
people at a meeting doesn't constitute community consent (or at least I 
don't think it should). Not sure what the magic numbers is, but I'd say we 
should have at least a few dozen people to support something-whatever it 
is-before we move forward. A lack of opposition shouldn't be viewed as 
support. Just my two cents.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <summit-request at sna.providence.ri.us>
To: <summit at sna.providence.ri.us>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 1:00 PM
Subject: Summit Digest, Vol 65, Issue 59


> Send Summit mailing list submissions to
> summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mail.sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> summit-request at sna.providence.ri.us
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> summit-owner at sna.providence.ri.us
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Summit digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Summit Digest, Vol 65, Issue 57 (Greg Gerritt)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:20:37 -0400
> From: Greg Gerritt <gerritt at mindspring.com>
> To: Megan Sandberg-Zakian <megansz at gmail.com>, Summit Neighborhood
> <summit at sna.providence.ri.us>
> Subject: Re: [Summit] Summit Digest, Vol 65, Issue 57
> Message-ID: <C89EE7D5.429B2%gerritt at mindspring.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
> This is one of the reeasons those who attended the last meeting called for 
> a
> multi month process, so that  we would have time to do all the due 
> diligene
> and community building necessary to move on this successfully.  greg
>
>
> on 8/28/10 4:03 PM, Megan Sandberg-Zakian at megansz at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Peter, I had the same question, and I also think it makes sense to
>> consider whether some kind of system might be put in place to allot
>> portions of the garden to those who live in the immediate vicinity.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From:?"Peter Gallant" <Pete1188 at cox.net>
>>> To:?<summit at sna.providence.ri.us>
>>> Date:?Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:57:15 -0400
>>> Subject:?Re: [Summit] Summit Digest, Vol 65, Issue 56
>>> They'll probably be OK with it, but are/will the people who live around 
>>> the
>>> Collyer Street garden be asked if they'd like a garden?
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Summit mailing list
>> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>> http://mail.sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Summit mailing list
> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
> http://mail.sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>
>
> End of Summit Digest, Vol 65, Issue 59
> **************************************