[Summit] It's a crime!

[Art Norwalk]

Nowhere does this article say anything about how much tax Romney paid 
between 1996 and 2009. The candidates do enough distorting; they 
don't need help from us.



>True; I guess "fiscal conservatism" is in the eye of the beholder: 
>"Hey, if we cut all these social programs for those 47% of 
>freeloading, thieving, victimized layabouts, then we're being 
>fiscally conservative!"
>
>What is, perhaps, most egregious--and ironic--in all this is that 
>Mitt Romney apparently paid nearly zero income taxes between 1996 
>and 2009 (the year before the 2010 tax return he actually made public):
><http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html
>
>So Mr Romney, it turns out, is one of the 47%. Interesting.
>
>Emlyn
>
>_______________________________________________
>Summit mailing list
>Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20121105/64cce269/attachment.htm>