[Summit] guidance sought on local questions on the ballot

[Greg Gerritt]

They all passed by wide margins.

On 11/7/12 3:58 PM, "barfootjim" <barfootjim at gmail.com> wrote:

>The ProJo listing of the results of local questions showed Providence
>as having "no local questions."  Anybody know how these came out?
>On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:28 PM, John Bazik wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:16:20PM -0500, Elizabeth Grossman wrote:
>>> I see that the ballot has some local questions  Some of them are
>>> Amendments to the Providence Home Rule charter and seem
>>> significant. Can anyone direct me to a site that explains the
>>> rationale for the changes? E
>>
>> http://www.providenceri.com/board-of-canvassers/2012-providence-
>> ballot-question-and-charter-0
>>
>> John
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Summit mailing list
>> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/
>> summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Summit mailing list
>Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/