[Summit] political discussions

Art Norwalk art at norwalkcom.com
Sat Oct 6 14:21:29 UTC 2012


I'll add my vote for civil discussion of political issues and 
candidates on the main list with hope that all will abide by Jim's Rules.

IN response to an earlier comment, to my knowledge the list has never 
been restricted to matters directly concerning SNA; it is a 
neighborhood discussion forum facilitated by SNA.

At 09:07 AM 10/6/2012, Martha Fraenkel wrote:

>I agree with Jim; political discussion with moderated tone is 
>appropriate for the listserv.
>
>On 10/6/2012 2:50 AM, Robert Mathiesen wrote:
>>I like Jim's politeness rules.
>>
>>On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 12:38 AM, barfootjim 
>><<mailto:barfootjim at gmail.com>barfootjim at gmail.com> wrote:
>>I agree that discussions of political issues that we have in common 
>>in this neighborhood should have a place in our discussions in 
>>general - on the main list.
>>
>>However, let's agree to a few politeness rules:
>>
>>1) no personal attacks, name-calling, or disparaging personal 
>>remarks aimed at ANY individual - keep it to what they say or do, 
>>not who they are;
>>2) if you use statistics, or other facts, to bolster your point of 
>>view, identify where you got them from;
>>3) no requests for contributions;
>>4) if you think a politician's approach is wrong, try to state why, 
>>and if possible, suggest a better way to solve a problem
>>5) you are free to have an opinion based on nothing specific, but 
>>if it's just that, say so.
>>
>>This can be a useful tool to help us all consider the alternatives, 
>>the plusses and minuses, and make informed decisions.
>>
>>
>>Let the whole list weigh in, if it chooses, on whether political 
>>issues and questions are or are not appropriate for the main Summit 
>>list.  Speaking for myself, I think that they are appropriate, and 
>>that this bears directly on the kind of community we want to have in Summit.
>>...
>>
>>
>>... it is a question of how we wish to be governed -- and only 
>>incidentally, which candidate might be more apt to govern us in the 
>>way we wish to be governed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Summit mailing list
>><mailto:Summit at sna.providence.ri.us>Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>>http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>>SNA Website: <http://sna.providence.ri.us/>http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>_______________________________________________
>Summit mailing list
>Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20121006/f4c0a719/attachment.htm>


More information about the Summit mailing list