[Summit] voter ID law

Elizabeth Cameron elizabethcameron at cox.net
Sun Oct 7 16:13:39 UTC 2012


I second Gloria's comments. I, too, have known Harold Metts for a long 
time and know he's a good and honest man, but it goes beyond that. The 
end to any discussion or disagreement now seems to be to call someone a 
racist.

Further, anyone who thinks voter fraud is some Republican or 
already-elected politician conspiracy is quite naive. And why should we 
not believe Anastasia? If long-time politicians are protecting their 
turfs, then wouldn't you want the newcomers to know that all the votes 
were fair? Certainly, many local elections in RI hinge on just a handful 
of votes or less.

I love the idea of photo id at the polls. Not only would everyone have a 
chance to get a photo, with no excuses (though if they can't get to the 
old photo id places, how do they get to the polls?), we would also have 
a photo of the person perpetrating fraud



On 10/6/2012 1:27 PM, Gloria L Johnson wrote:
> I have known Mr. Metts for almost 30 years and I cannot tell how offensive it is to call him a racist.   I am astounded by that statement!   It also amazes me that just because you disagree with someone that you resort to name calling.
>
> And let me get this straight, so if we are Democrats we all have to believe and agree on the same thing?   And if not, risk being labeled some offensive thing?





More information about the Summit mailing list