<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I know that at least from the public projects perspective, any work using Federal funds and that may affect a historic property or public use park requires a thorough review with several entities. For this reason most of the projects tends to discard alternatives that affect a public park.<br><br><div>
Francisco J. Lovera <BR></div><br><br><br><br>> From: gayle@ceffect.com<br>> To: summit@sna.providence.ri.us<br>> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:29:36 -0400<br>> Subject: [Summit] Level of protection of our parks<br>> <br>> Does anyone on the list know the level of protection for the preservation of<br>> Lippett Park? (and Blackstone Boulevard and Park).<br>> <br>> The question of protection came up in another forum yesterday and it made me<br>> curious about our own parks.<br>> <br>> As I understood it, the highest level of protection is having a conservation<br>> easement on the property, with the next level deeded restrictions and the<br>> bottom level conservation intent.<br>> <br>> Does anyone know how well our parks are protected?<br>> <br>> <br>> ********************<br>> Gayle L. Gifford, ACFRE<br>> President<br>> Cause & Effect Inc.<br>> Strategic change for a more just and peaceful world.<br>> Author of "How are we doing? A 1 hr guide to evaluating the performance of<br>> your nonprofit board"<br>> Sign up for our monthly newsletter at www.ceffect.com<br>> You can reach us at gayle@ceffect.com <br>> Find Tools for Change at our web site www.ceffect.com along with our blog<br>> The Butterfly Effect<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Summit mailing list<br>> Summit@sna.providence.ri.us<br>> http://mail.sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us<br>> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/<br> </body>
</html>