<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19120"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt" id=role_body
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=3 face=Arial>
<DIV><FONT size=4>I thought about that---but there is parking only one side of
the street...This would we be excluded?----Howie</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 9/22/2011 10:05:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
tschmeling@ric.edu writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>Does
anyone know if the City has considered the following, which was used
effectively where I used to live?<BR><BR>Alternate side parking: M, W, F, Su
on one side, T, R, Sat on the other. Move your car to the other side by
8:00am or you get ticketed (or towed during snow).<BR><BR>This arrangement has
three advantages: 1) no junk cars left on the street for
days/weeks/months. 2) Both sides of the street get plowed over 48 hours,
and 3) Two cars can still pass (which they can't really do with cars
parked on both sides of (with apologies to Andrew) my street.<BR><BR>Yes, it
was sometimes annoying to have to get up at 8am on Sunday to move the
car. And yes, the city would have to put up signs.<BR><BR>Any thoughts
about this sort of
plan?<BR><BR>Tom<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>