[Summit] Summit Digest, Vol 92, Issue 33
Ina Fuchs
imfuchs at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 6 20:47:17 UTC 2012
Just be happy that people care enough to vote!! That is what a democracy offers!! In previous elections at the same place you could just walk in. No interested citizens in sight! Be glad it wasn't raining or snowing!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2012, at 3:35 PM, summit-request at sna.providence.ri.us wrote:
> Send Summit mailing list submissions to
> summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> summit-request at sna.providence.ri.us
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> summit-owner at sna.providence.ri.us
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Summit digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Voting (Julia Steiny)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:34:28 -0500
> From: Julia Steiny <juliasteiny at gmail.com>
> To: Craig Borges <craigborges at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "summit at sna.providence.ri.us" <summit at sna.providence.ri.us>
> Subject: Re: [Summit] Voting
> Message-ID:
> <CAPsWCMZ_Lq5hQ63qWiXPjB8pDg0ONuBasZ5dqZKhAQVz1+O_FQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> 2 hours at MLK.
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Craig Borges <craigborges at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Ridiculously long wait at Summit polling on Hillside. Came this morning
>> was told the wait was up to two hours. I'm back, to try again. Long line at
>> 3:20. This is no way to run a democracy. If I can't get out if here in less
>> them an hour I am going to have to forfeit my right to vote. It wasn't like
>> this when we voted at Fire station. Any thoughts on who was behind this
>> change?
>> Craig Borges
>> 4th street
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2012, at 11:43 AM, summit-request at sna.providence.ri.us wrote:
>>
>>> Send Summit mailing list submissions to
>>> summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>>>
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> summit-request at sna.providence.ri.us
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> summit-owner at sna.providence.ri.us
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Summit digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. brown water (Amanda Woodward)
>>> 2. Re: brown water (David Schrag)
>>> 3. It's a crime! (Emlyn Addison)
>>> 4. Re: It's a crime! (Art Norwalk)
>>> 5. Re: It's a crime! (JaNean Fisher)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:45:57 -0800 (PST)
>>> From: Amanda Woodward <awoodward7 at verizon.net>
>>> To: Summit Neighborhood <summit at sna.providence.ri.us>
>>> Subject: [Summit] brown water
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <1352130357.95584.YahooMailNeo at web84507.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> Good Day
>>> Anyone experiencing brown water?
>>> Amanda
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20121105/1bfbd215/attachment-0001.html
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:48:46 -0500
>>> From: David Schrag <david at schrag.net>
>>> To: Amanda Woodward <awoodward7 at verizon.net>
>>> Cc: Summit Neighborhood <summit at sna.providence.ri.us>
>>> Subject: Re: [Summit] brown water
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <CAJ01qyOoYrFWFb7nR7PvNbJpfw39LuhNvwgWyqGbouX9GQ+kfw at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>
>>> We did on 5th Street this morning. They shut off our water service in
>>> the late evening and brought it back on line in the wee hours of the
>>> morning. The water was only brown for a few moments today before
>>> clearing up.
>>>
>>> We got a notice on our door on Friday that they were going to do this,
>>> but the date was sometime in 2010. We had no idea it was scheduled for
>>> last night.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Amanda Woodward <awoodward7 at verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>>> Good Day
>>>> Anyone experiencing brown water?
>>>> Amanda
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Summit mailing list
>>>> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>>>>
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>>>> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:51:40 -0500
>>> From: Emlyn Addison <noisyblocks at gmail.com>
>>> To: summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>>> Subject: [Summit] It's a crime!
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <CAEAT3MGmJDhudjErZtM8RgsUyTyq7avw30TjN=C1YgpjZxPR3Q at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>>> Isn't Mitt saying he won't raise taxes on the middle class as well?
>> It's
>>>> hard to keep track of what Mitt is saying. It's not a choice between
>> being
>>>> fiscally conservative and socially just, the republicans are NOT the
>> party
>>>> of fiscal conservatism. They are the party of small government. Since
>>>> Gingrich shut down the government during the Clinton years, republicans
>>>> have sought to starve the government of funds. They are somewhat good
>> at
>>>> cutting taxes but not so good at cutting spending, particularly military
>>>> spending. GW Bush cut taxes, did nothing to cut spending, and put 2
>> wars
>>>> on the credit card. Reagan blew up the deficit as well, BTW. How can
>>>> anyone think republicans are a fiscally conservative party? Where is
>> the
>>>> evidence of that?
>>>
>>> True; I guess "fiscal conservatism" is in the eye of the beholder: "Hey,
>> if
>>> we cut all these social programs for those 47% of freeloading, thieving,
>>> victimized layabouts, then we're being fiscally conservative!"
>>>
>>> What is, perhaps, most egregious--and ironic--in all this is that Mitt
>>> Romney apparently paid nearly zero income taxes between 1996 and 2009
>> (the
>>> year before the 2010 tax return he actually made public):
>>>
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html
>>>
>>> So Mr Romney, it turns out, is one of the 47%. Interesting.
>>>
>>> Emlyn
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20121105/58497e56/attachment-0001.html
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:39:39 -0500
>>> From: Art Norwalk <art at norwalkcom.com>
>>> To: Emlyn Addison <noisyblocks at gmail.com>,summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>>> Subject: Re: [Summit] It's a crime!
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <
>> mailman.226.1352133829.8692.summit_sna.providence.ri.us at sna.providence.ri.us
>>>
>>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
>>>
>>> Nowhere does this article say anything about how much tax Romney paid
>>> between 1996 and 2009. The candidates do enough distorting; they
>>> don't need help from us.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> True; I guess "fiscal conservatism" is in the eye of the beholder:
>>>> "Hey, if we cut all these social programs for those 47% of
>>>> freeloading, thieving, victimized layabouts, then we're being
>>>> fiscally conservative!"
>>>>
>>>> What is, perhaps, most egregious--and ironic--in all this is that
>>>> Mitt Romney apparently paid nearly zero income taxes between 1996
>>>> and 2009 (the year before the 2010 tax return he actually made public):
>>>> <
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html
>>>
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html
>>>>
>>>> So Mr Romney, it turns out, is one of the 47%. Interesting.
>>>>
>>>> Emlyn
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Summit mailing list
>>>> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>>>>
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>>>> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20121105/72af2bf5/attachment.html
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 5
>>> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:43:48 -0500
>>> From: JaNean Fisher <jfchocomom77 at gmail.com>
>>> To: Summit Neighborhood <Summit at sna.providence.ri.us>
>>> Subject: Re: [Summit] It's a crime!
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <CAOV9mn-w23_v-=nvETREJQ1ut6j2UAD=aLRuwK64VUkkJzNmug at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> Seriously, only on the East Side could someone let everyone know that
>> they
>>> had a break-in to make others
>>> aware,and then be condemned for having security lights, not having an
>>> alarm, blame the police for not doing
>>> their job, change the entire thread of conversation to a political rant
>> (as
>>> though we haven't
>>> already listened to your drivel for the last 2 months!) as if MItt/O were
>>> personally responsible.
>>>
>>> Focus and respond responsibly and keep your political opinions to
>> yourself!
>>> I care about a neighbor
>>> experiencing a problem and if I can help, I will. I don't care to know
>> what
>>> you think about the election,
>>>
>>> JaNean
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Emlyn Addison <noisyblocks at gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Isn't Mitt saying he won't raise taxes on the middle class as well?
>> It's
>>>>> hard to keep track of what Mitt is saying. It's not a choice between
>>>>> being
>>>>> fiscally conservative and socially just, the republicans are NOT the
>> party
>>>>> of fiscal conservatism. They are the party of small government. Since
>>>>> Gingrich shut down the government during the Clinton years, republicans
>>>>> have sought to starve the government of funds. They are somewhat good
>> at
>>>>> cutting taxes but not so good at cutting spending, particularly
>> military
>>>>> spending. GW Bush cut taxes, did nothing to cut spending, and put 2
>> wars
>>>>> on the credit card. Reagan blew up the deficit as well, BTW. How can
>>>>> anyone think republicans are a fiscally conservative party? Where is
>> the
>>>>> evidence of that?
>>>>
>>>> True; I guess "fiscal conservatism" is in the eye of the beholder: "Hey,
>>>> if we cut all these social programs for those 47% of freeloading,
>> thieving,
>>>> victimized layabouts, then we're being fiscally conservative!"
>>>>
>>>> What is, perhaps, most egregious--and ironic--in all this is that Mitt
>>>> Romney apparently paid nearly zero income taxes between 1996 and 2009
>> (the
>>>> year before the 2010 tax return he actually made public):
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html
>>>>
>>>> So Mr Romney, it turns out, is one of the 47%. Interesting.
>>>>
>>>> Emlyn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Summit mailing list
>>>> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>>>>
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>>>> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20121105/8713b2ff/attachment.html
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Summit mailing list
>>> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>>>
>>>
>>> End of Summit Digest, Vol 92, Issue 18
>>> **************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Summit mailing list
>> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
>> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Julia
> www.juliasteiny.com
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20121106/9cab73e5/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Summit mailing list
> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
>
>
> End of Summit Digest, Vol 92, Issue 33
> **************************************
More information about the Summit
mailing list