[Summit] Level of protection of our parks

[Francisco Lovera]

I know that at least from the public projects perspective, any work using Federal funds and that may affect a historic property or public use park requires a thorough review with several entities.  For this reason most of the projects tends to discard alternatives that affect a public park.


Francisco J. Lovera 



> From: gayle at ceffect.com
> To: summit at sna.providence.ri.us
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:29:36 -0400
> Subject: [Summit] Level of protection of our parks
> 
> Does anyone on the list know the level of protection for the preservation of
> Lippett Park? (and Blackstone Boulevard and Park).
> 
> The question of protection came up in another forum yesterday and it made me
> curious about our own parks.
> 
> As I understood it, the highest level of protection is having a conservation
> easement on the property, with the next level deeded restrictions and the
> bottom level conservation intent.
> 
> Does anyone know how well our parks are protected?
> 
>  
> ********************
> Gayle L. Gifford, ACFRE
> President
> Cause & Effect Inc.
> Strategic change for a more just and peaceful world.
> Author of "How are we doing? A 1 hr guide to evaluating the performance of
> your nonprofit board"
> Sign up for our monthly newsletter at www.ceffect.com
> You can reach us at gayle at ceffect.com 
> Find Tools for Change at our web site www.ceffect.com along with our blog
> The Butterfly Effect
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Summit mailing list
> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
> http://mail.sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20101029/e92a29a0/attachment.htm>