[Summit] SNA is wrong

Julie McCoy jmccoy49 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 00:32:22 UTC 2012


Louise, I couldn't agree more. The SNA board members volunteer so much time
and work so hard to make this a true neighborhood. In my experience,
they've provided plenty of opportunity for feedback. Even if there's a
glitch now and then, I think we can all assume that they are doing their
best, and I expect they are happy to consider constructive criticism.

Julie McCoy

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, louise zuckerman <rlzuckerman at msn.com>wrote:

>  I served on the SNA board for 15 years and know that the board consists
> of many hard working volunteers who are trying  to improve our community.
> If you agree with them get involved and let them know. If you disagree get
> involved and voice your concerns.  How easy it is to be critical from the
> sidelines.
>
> Louise Zuckerman
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:42:30 -0400
> From: ridotshaw at gmail.com
> To: summit at sna.providence.ri.us
> Subject: [Summit] SNA is wrong
>
>
> this is what this is about, SNA thinks it speaks for the neighborhood
> when the park planning for the fountain at lippit occurred, SNA did all
> the input
> UP TO A POINT
>
> SNA thought it was fine to cut trees down!!!
> When some of us objected - we were told that we should live with it, our
> opinion was not that important and
> when the fountain was working, we would learn to live with the cut trees.
>
> the leader of this project and way of thinking was that guy Jessie
> Poledicmas
>
> but, when the tree cutting started, the REAL summit neighborhood stood up
> and said NO
> so, the trees weren't cut down.
>
> that fountain project will not last - someone is going to get hurt, the
> settlement will be big enough to stop the fountain
> and some of the trees were cut down
>
> better yet, guess what the next idea for lippit was:  community garden.
> And guess who wanted to do it
> Poledicmas.  But, the SNA org figured out that they better reach out this
> time.  An sure enough, people said no.
> and there was no "community" (very small definition of community).  Now,
> once again we see the idea for a community garden.
> I suspect Poledicmas is somewhere in those weeds.
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Summit mailing list
> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.usSNA Website:
> http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Summit mailing list
> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20121023/471c1849/attachment.htm>


More information about the Summit mailing list